As human beings we want to believe that health care is a right simply to demonstrate that we are creatures of compassion with a properly functioning moral compass. It would seem less than civilized to not consider health care to be an entitlement, but the truth is that such care must be provided by other citizens that also have rights and freedoms that must be respected. Simply transferring a right from one person to another is not doing anything for our society, nor will it ever. We humans have a great capacity to help others if it remains our choice to do so, but that becomes very limited once it is forced upon us. All of us have a right to pursue quality health care, but not at the expense of our fellow citizens. Adding this perspective to the dialogue paints a more comprehensive picture and accordingly it becomes obvious that health care can not be a right because it violates the rights of another; it should be viewed as a privilege to be “pursued” regardless of how uncaring or objectionable that may sound. It is an imperfect world that we live in and there is a cost to everything that must be paid, so it stands to reason that consumers should compensate providers for any goods or services they receive and not expect others to be obligated. Subscribing to this tried and true practice ensures that everyone’s rights remain intact thereby alleviating this whole debate.

Unions in a nutshell are simply nothing more than labor socialism, and being such makes it very difficult for them to be competitive. In a Union, as in any large group, there are going to be highly productive individuals as well as the average and below average people with protected jobs and pay based on seniority. Not using performance based criteria results in the best performers having to cover for the performance of the laggards which results in the collective being average at best. The optimal method would be to reward the highly productive, purge the laggards, and motivate the average workers to become better, only this will ensure an improved workforce and higher productivity. Union members also must pay dues for the privilege of being a part of this created and protected “average” collective. It exists by building worker dependency that will ensure those dues will continue to roll in for management so they can keep cashing their nice paychecks. The strategy employed is to keep the workers subjugated so they can be used as pawns for the ultimate goal of securing money and power for the privileged few. This sounds precisely like another institution we are all familiar with as citizens known as our Government. Hmm!

It is easy to see why the Union model is failing in this country and it will continue to do so unless it can begin to seriously focus itself to compete with the intention of winning in the marketplace and not just surviving for maximum entitlement. In the absence of this kind of motivation, the more ambitious, focused, and disciplined competitors around the world will be happy to bury them. Competing in the marketplace is crucial because it determines success and failure, and it will be very hard for them to accomplish considering the entitled environment created by the Union mindset. This labor socialism is obviously going to be at a major disadvantage because it does not motivate its workers to excel and there is little individual responsibility expected. The marketplace will continue to require more efficiency from the producers that are willing and able to deliver it, and the rest will slowly erode away. Extorting a mediocre manufacturer for better pay and benefits while ignoring global competition is destined to fail, instead maybe they should focus on why they are “mediocre” to begin with and be more proactive with that issue than with demanding any more concessions.