<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dose of Clarity &#187; health reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doseofclarity.com/tag/health-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doseofclarity.com</link>
	<description>Logic and common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Health care can not be a right</title>
		<link>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/health-care-can-not-be-a-right/</link>
		<comments>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/health-care-can-not-be-a-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entitlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doseofclarity.com/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health care can not possibly be a right in our society unless it is considered acceptable to retract the rights of others to pursue their own livelihoods.  Typically, health care being a right is an assertion that usually follows any discussion about one’s ability to pay for such services.  For one citizen to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health care can not possibly be a right in our society unless it is considered acceptable to retract the rights of others to pursue their own livelihoods.  Typically, health care being a right is an assertion that usually follows any discussion about one’s ability to pay for such services.  For one citizen to believe that they have a right to complimentary health care is to further believe that another citizen must have the obligation to provide that care, thus denying that person their own rights as a citizen.  Nobody in our society should have the expectation of entitlement that depends on the efforts of others, or alternatively, no citizen has a right to infringe on another person’s living.  It is no different than believing that a homebuilder should not be compelled to build a house for another because they are homeless, nor should a car dealer be forced to provide a car to someone that does not have one.  In general, most rights that are recognized are regarded as negative rights <span id="more-631"></span>meaning we are free to pursue something in life without interference; this is opposed to positive rights that obligate a person into action on behalf of another.  Positive rights are acknowledged in our society, but complimentary receipt of them should not be expected, otherwise the rights of one are trampled in order to accommodate the other. </p>
<p>As human beings we want to believe that health care is a right simply to demonstrate that we are creatures of compassion with a properly functioning moral compass.  It would seem less than civilized to not consider health care to be an entitlement, but the truth is that such care must be provided by other citizens that also have rights and freedoms that must be respected.  Simply transferring a right from one person to another is not doing anything for our society, nor will it ever.  We humans have a great capacity to help others if it remains our choice to do so, but that becomes very limited once it is forced upon us.  All of us have a right to pursue quality health care, but not at the expense of our fellow citizens.  Adding this perspective to the dialogue paints a more comprehensive picture and accordingly it becomes obvious that health care can not be a right because it violates the rights of another; it should be viewed as a privilege to be “pursued” regardless of how uncaring or objectionable that may sound.  It is an imperfect world that we live in and there is a cost to everything that must be paid, so it stands to reason that consumers should compensate providers for any goods or services they receive and not expect others to be obligated.  Subscribing to this tried and true practice ensures that everyone’s rights remain intact thereby alleviating this whole debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/health-care-can-not-be-a-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Characterizing the insurance mandate</title>
		<link>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/characterizing-the-insurance-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/characterizing-the-insurance-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doseofclarity.com/?p=597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of public debate lately about having an insurance mandate as part of the health care reform proposal, and the characterization of it has been met with varying opinions.  The main disparity is centered on whether this should be considered a tax increase hence breaking the campaign promise of not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of public debate lately about having an insurance mandate as part of the health care reform proposal, and the characterization of it has been met with varying opinions.  The main disparity is centered on whether this should be considered a tax increase hence breaking the campaign promise of not raising taxes on people making less than $250k.  Supporters of the mandate are feverishly defending it as simply providing for one’s own health care or being assessed a penalty upon failure to obtain such coverage.  Critics are countering with the fact that the Government is mandating this on its citizens thus it is effectively a tax.  While the politicians, pundits, and the media are debating how to label this forced participation, it should not be difficult for us citizens to characterize the end result.  Regardless of what official label is ascribed to it as the political games continue, the one certainty is it will extract money out of the pockets of citizens.  This will surely <span id="more-597"></span>be the case if you are not currently buying insurance or if you are directed to upgrade your current policy because it is deemed insufficient or unacceptable by our Government.  From a logical point of view, it really does not matter if you call it a tax, penalty, fine, assessment, fee, or any other designation because the Government taking or directing money away from someone involuntarily will still have the same tangible impact.  If people prefer to call it a penalty versus a tax or a fee versus a fine then they are free to do so because the result is identical.  The debate is disingenuous because it is nothing more than political posturing for the sole purpose of shaping the public’s opinion on classifying the sequestering of people from their money, but we as a public should understand this.  It seems foolish to care about the political debate describing the mandate when the outcome of its implementation is already known, we should remain observant of substance over form.  This game is only important to politicians so they can refute any future accusations of busted campaign promises once confronted by opponents, but it should remain pointless to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doseofclarity.com/politics/characterizing-the-insurance-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
